These guidelines will help you
determine who is responsible if you slip or trip and fall on
someone else's property.
Many thousands of people are injured each year -- some very
seriously -- when they slip or trip and fall on a dangerous
floor, a flight of stairs or a rough patch of ground. If you
have been injured in this way, first consider that it is a
normal part of living for things to fall or to drip on a floor
or the ground, and for smooth surfaces to become uneven. Also,
some things put in the ground -- a drainage grate, for example
-- serve a useful purpose there. Therefore, someone who owns
or occupies property cannot always be held responsible for
immediately picking up or cleaning every slippery substance on
a floor. Nor is a property owner always responsible for
someone slipping or tripping on something that an ordinary
person should expect to find there or should see and avoid. We
all have an obligation to watch where we're going.
There is no precise way to determine when someone else is
legally responsible for something on which you slip or trip.
Each case turns on whether the property owner acted carefully
so that slipping or tripping was not likely to happen -- and
whether you were careless in not seeing or avoiding the thing
you fell on. Here are some general rules to help you decide
whether someone else was at fault for your slip or trip and
fall injury.
Determining a Property or Business Owner's Liability
To be legally responsible for the injuries you suffered
from slipping or tripping and falling on someone else's
property, the owner of the premises or the owner's employee:
must have caused the spill, worn or torn spot, or other
slippery or dangerous surface or item, to be underfoot
must have known of the dangerous surface but did nothing
about it, or
should have known of the dangerous surface because a
"reasonable" person taking care of the property would have
discovered and removed or repaired it.
The third situation is the most common, but is also less
clear-cut than the first two because of those pesky words
"should have known." Liability in these cases is decided by
common sense. The law determines whether the owner or occupier
of property was careful by deciding if the steps the owner or
occupier took to keep the property safe were reasonable.
Reasonable Care of Property
In determining a property owner's "reasonableness," the law
concentrates on whether the owner makes regular and thorough
efforts to keep the property safe and clean. Here are some
initial questions you can ask to determine whether a property
or business owner may be liable for your slip or trip and fall
injuries:
If you tripped over a torn, broken or bulging area of
carpet, floor or ground, or slipped on a wet or loose area,
had the dangerous spot been there long enough so that the
owner should have known about it?
Does the property owner have a regular procedure for
examining and cleaning or repairing the premises? If so,
what is it and what proof does the owner have of this
regular maintenance?
If you tripped over or slipped on an object someone had
placed or left on or in the floor or ground, was there a
legitimate reason for the object to be there?
If there once had been a good reason for the object to
be there but that reason no longer exists, could the object
have been removed or covered or otherwise made safe?
Was there a safer place the object could have been
located, or placed in a safer manner, without much greater
inconvenience or expense to the property owner or operator?
Could a simple barrier have been created or warning
given to prevent people from slipping or tripping?
Did poor or broken lighting contribute to the accident?
If the answers to one or more of these questions come out
in your favor, you may have a good claim for compensation.
However, you must still think about whether your own
carelessness contributed in any significant way to your
accident.
Consider Your Own Carelessness
In almost every slip or trip and fall case, you must decide
whether your carelessness contributed to the accident. The
rules of "comparative negligence" help measure your own
reasonableness in going where you did, in the way you did,
just before the accident happened. There are some questions
you should ask yourself about your own conduct -- an insurance
adjuster will almost certainly ask them after you file your
claim.
Did you have a legitimate reason -- a reason the owner
should have anticipated -- for being where the dangerous
ground was?
Should a careful person have noticed the dangerous spot
and avoided it, or walked carefully enough not to slip or
trip?
Were there any warnings that the spot might be
dangerous?
Were you doing anything that distracted you from paying
attention to where you were going, or were you running,
jumping or fooling around in a way that made falling more
likely?
You don't have to "prove" to an insurance adjuster that you
were careful. But think about what you were doing, and
describe it clearly so that an insurance adjuster will
understand that you were not careless.